Skip to content

Research by RootKnow.

Making more is only half the future.

AI, robots and energy could expand what we can produce. But capacity only improves lives when people can access it. RootKnow is building RealMaker to explore how independent people, businesses and machines could make that transition together.

A RootKnow program, in developmentRealMaker

RealMaker is a living model of an economy: who has what, what they need, which futures they could create together, and what changes when they act. A private Node helps each participant understand and operate their own life or work. World connects the information they choose to share.

An original technical engraving of people, knowledge, production machinery, energy and deep resource layers in one economic world.

One world. Private depth. Shared possibilities.

Understand your own situation first. Connect selected information to explore what could change together.

Private Nodes

Your own operating view

Skills, money, time, contracts, tools and local decisions.

PersonBusinessMachine
Depth stays with its owner.
Shared World

A possible economic future

Selected needs, contributions, conditions and commitments.

What changes for each participant?
Real systems

Owners make the change

People, software and equipment act under local authority.

A delivered result leaves evidence.

Evidence updates the same Nodes and World.

Projected connectionEvidence returning to the model
What we're building
Know what you have. See what you could do.

Skills, money, time, commitments and connected tools belong in one private view. A Node would use that depth to help you act locally, then share a useful answer or offer when you choose. For a workshop: which orders can we actually accept?

A projection shows a future and its dependencies.

What if a repairer, a designer and a workshop could supply a replacement part together? World would show who contributes, who benefits, what remains unknown and which condition makes that future possible. Change a condition; the projection should change.

A possible route still needs its owners.

The workshop controls its machine. The lender controls its funding. The learner chooses which opportunity to accept. Participants could make conditional commitments; actual work would run through their own people, software and equipment.

Evidence changes the next possible future.

A delivered part, acquired skill or settled payment changes what participants can do next. Those observations belong in the same model, alongside what remains projected or unknown. RootKnow tests whether that loop improves outcomes and broadens access.

Three illustrative projections

Change one condition. See what becomes possible.

Private workspace

Make room for the next step.

You want to learn bicycle repair. Your Node could help you compare what you already know, the time you have and the practice you still need.

Your other goals and private history stay with you.

What you choose to share

Share one request or offer.

For example: I'm looking for a bicycle-repair practice session on Saturday.

Your decision

Accept the work you choose.

Someone could offer a session. You decide whether its time, cost and conditions work for you. Sharing a request does not commit you to a booking.

Why selective sharing matters

Choose person, business or place to see how a Node could help.

A projection describes a future and the conditions it depends on. Change one condition below; the possible route changes with it.

A learner could become a repairer.

Starting situation

The learner knows the basics, but has not practiced the repair.

Without access to tools

Keep studying the theory.

A course outline can explain the repair. It cannot provide the tools or hands-on practice.

With access to tools

Repair a bicycle independently.

Guided practice could turn knowledge into a demonstrated skill, and open up new work.

LearnerTime to practiceTerms not yet established
InstructorGuided practiceTerms not yet established
WorkshopTools and powerAssumed available
ParticipantsAgreed, affordable termsTerms not yet established
What would count as a real change?

Observe the repair, test the bicycle and record what the learner can do without help.

Illustrative projections. Participants, availability and commitments here are examples, not live records or completed outcomes.

Try a small example

What does it take to repair a machine?

A repairer has the skill; a workshop has the tools and power. Try removing the tools, giving permission or adding a completion record. The example shows the difference between being able to do a job, agreeing to it and checking that it is done.

Person

Repair skill

The repairer knows what to do.

Available

Workshop

Tools & power

The workshop supplies what the repair needs.

Available

The goal

A working machine

The goal. Completion still needs to be checked.

Awaiting permission

The skill and tools are available. The workshop owner must agree before the repair can start.

A hypothetical repair. The controls change this example; they do not book work or certify a real repair.

Research that can find the idea wrong.

RootKnow is founded and operated by Ka. RealMaker is in early development. We ask whether shared projections can lead to useful commitments, real outcomes and wider access, and where physical scarcity, cost or incentives prevent that. Public app access is not open from this site.

Before a commitment

Project

Show a possible future, its contributors and its conditions. Keep what is known, assumed and still missing visible.

When resources arrive

Materialize

Owners accept the work. Real people, software and equipment make the change; a picture cannot do that for them.

As reality changes

Update

Return evidence to the same model. Update capabilities, costs and access, then examine which futures are possible now.